From cottrell@wfu.edu Mon Apr 25 09:52:21 2011 From: Allin Cottrell To: gretl-devel@gretlml.univpm.it Subject: Re: [Gretl-devel] String for Translation Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 09:52:20 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?31393=5F1303667546=5Fp3OHqQI0032002=5FBANLkTi=3DuFw5A?= =?utf-8?q?HHo7rMMmDO4FfPLKuffx=3Dw=40mail=2Egmail=2Ecom?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5076324763251444878==" --===============5076324763251444878== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Henrique Andrade wrote: > Em 11 de abril Henrique escreveu: > > Dear Allin, > > > > I'd found a string that I think are not marked for translation: > > > > Q-stat (in the correlogram window) That one was already marked. > I've found another unmarked strings: > > (1) Garch variants (on main menu); > (2) including (on Johansen integration test results window); > (3) Corrected for sample size (df = ) (on Johansen integration test results > window). Those are now added. Allin --===============5076324763251444878==-- From ignacio.diaz-emparanza@ehu.es Fri Apr 29 07:11:22 2011 From: Ignacio Diaz-Emparanza To: gretl-devel@gretlml.univpm.it Subject: [Gretl-devel] loop foreach in another loop Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:11:20 +0200 Message-ID: <4DBA9CD8.8050505@ehu.es> In-Reply-To: Pine.A41.4.58.1104250951300.672000@f1n11.sp2net.wfu.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8286180658501859868==" --===============8286180658501859868== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit This is only to report that this construction does not work: the error produced by gretl is ? list xreg5 = varA5 varB5 varC5 ? list lreg5 = null ? loop foreach i xreg5 Unknown variable name in command I also tried susbtituting the first (variable) list by a string but this did not work Finally, I solved the problem rather easily making that the name of the list in the 'loop foreach' line be fixed: the list 'lista' is overwritten in each iteration of the first loop and the lists I need are formed by the second loop. But I think the first construction should work, no? -- Ignacio Diaz-Emparanza DEPARTAMENTO DE ECONOMÍA APLICADA III (ECONOMETRÍA Y ESTADÍSTICA) UPV/EHU Avda. Lehendakari Aguirre, 83 | 48015 BILBAO T.: +34 946013732 | F.: +34 946013754 www.ea3.ehu.es --===============8286180658501859868==--