Am 24.07.2018 um 17:27 schrieb Allin
Cottrell:
Am 24.07.2018 um 16:18 schrieb Allin
Cottrell:
Following discussions between Jack and
myself, here's a sort of
"RFC" for changing the internal definition of "NA" in gretl,
which we believe can be done with full backward compatibility.
Yes, I think "nice feature but we don't have it currently" is
about right. Consider the following (abdata has lots of missing
values, including the very first observation):
<hansl>
open abdata.gdt
WAGE[1] = WAGE[1] * 0
...
The first
"print" shows that the leading NA for WAGE has indeed been changed
to 0 (defensibly).
...
Under the proposed scheme NAs (= nans) would not turn into zeros
on multiplication by zero -- but the misszero() function would
still be available to do that job.
OK, but doesn't this consitute a counterexample to the claim of full
backward compatibility? This doesn't have to be bad, given the
perhaps kind of flaky behavior currently, but it would change
something, no?
thanks,
sven