On 06.04.2016 02:23, Allin Cottrell wrote:
On Tue, 5 Apr 2016, Hélio Guilherme wrote:

I never used stackexchange (I do use stackoverflow :) ).
Looking at Area 51 (before becoming public and active), there are some
interesting areas but it shows some difficulties in passing the "public
beta" target. For example, Machine Learning was Closed, and Matlab is open
but with only 33 participants. [...]

You're right, it's not assured that we can get a "gretl community" accepted on stackexchange. However, I think it would be worth a try. If I don't hear strong objections I'll try putting in a submission on their "Area 51". (I'm not saying that I am uniquely qualified to make such a a submission, but it might help that I'm the founder of the project; I can give them some statistics on gretl-user postings, and -- with some help from Sven and Jack! -- on sourceforge tracker entries and downloads.)
There already exist some questions, which are tagged with a gretl tag, perhaps we could start answering and helping people and by that creating a stronger community over there. I think that would also give it a better visibility, when searching gretl related issues on any search engine, or?

It probably makes sense to focus on the stats.statsexchange.com community, which has a very broad focus on statistics and econometrics.
I doubt that you get your own community only for gretl and perhaps we should focus more on using already existing communities, but that's just my opinion. :-)
Johannes

(the mailing list should exist for ever!)

That's what I think too. But the stackexchange format could be quite useful, if we can get in the door. Might give us some additional visibility.

Allin


_______________________________________________
Gretl-devel mailing list
Gretl-devel@lists.wfu.edu
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-devel