Your very last line call missed off a dash in the option call to iterate:

# restriction w/o bug
? restrict "Grunfeld"
? b[1,1] - 1.0*b[2,1] = 0.0
? end restrict
Restriction:
 b[1,1] - b[2,1] = 0
? estimate "Grunfeld" method=sur --iterate

Equation system, Grunfeld
Estimator: iterated Seemingly Unrelated Regressions

Convergence achieved after 8 iterations
Log-likelihood = -191.162

Equation 1: SUR, using observations 1935-1954 (T = 20)
Dependent variable: I_GM

             coefficient   std. error   t-ratio   p-value
  --------------------------------------------------------
  const       0.905304     7.34529       0.1232   0.9034 
  C_GM        0.382970     0.0350351    10.93     4.14e-09 ***
  F_GM        0.0840394    0.00717758   11.71     1.46e-09 ***

Mean dependent var   608.0200   S.D. dependent var   309.5746
Sum squared resid    160284.7   S.E. of regression   89.52227
R-squared            0.914146   Adjusted R-squared   0.904046

Equation 2: SUR, using observations 1935-1954 (T = 20)
Dependent variable: I_WE

             coefficient   std. error   t-ratio   p-value
  -------------------------------------------------------
  const       0.905304     7.34529      0.1232    0.9034
  C_WE        0.0959631    0.0513073    1.870     0.0788  *
  F_WE        0.0504019    0.0143477    3.513     0.0027  ***

Mean dependent var   42.89150   S.D. dependent var   19.11019
Sum squared resid    1776.588   S.E. of regression   9.424935
R-squared            0.744287   Adjusted R-squared   0.714204

Cross-equation VCV for residuals
(correlations above the diagonal)

       8014.2      (0.186)
       157.11       88.829

log determinant = 13.4404

LR test for the specified restrictions:
  Restricted log-likelihood = -191.162
  Unrestricted log-likelihood = -190.109
  Chi-square(1) = 2.10586 [0.1467]

Does that answer your question?

C


On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 at 14:10, <gretl-devel-request@lists.wfu.edu> wrote:
Send Gretl-devel mailing list submissions to
        gretl-devel@lists.wfu.edu

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-devel
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        gretl-devel-request@lists.wfu.edu

You can reach the person managing the list at
        gretl-devel-owner@lists.wfu.edu

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gretl-devel digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Screen resolution and gretl window "sharpness" (Sven Schreiber)
   2. gretlcli termination (crash?) with gnuplot error (Sven Schreiber)
   3. Re: gretlcli termination (crash?) with gnuplot error
      (Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti)
   4. Re: gretlcli termination (crash?) with gnuplot error
      (Sven Schreiber)
   5. signs in equation system restrictions (Pozdeev, Igor)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 18:09:11 +0100
From: Sven Schreiber <svetosch@gmx.net>
To: Gretl development <gretl-devel@lists.wfu.edu>
Subject: [Gretl-devel] Screen resolution and gretl window "sharpness"
Message-ID: <0727e328-f36b-3924-8347-7ae733785895@gmx.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

Hi,
I have now seen gretl operate on a Laptop with a 1920x1080 resolution on
a fairly small screen, thus high pixel density. Gretl's window and the
fonts in there look noticeably less sharp / more pixelated than other
programs (say, more "native" Windows programs). I suppose this is a GTK
limitation? Or is there something that can be done?

thanks
sven


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 13:54:57 +0100
From: Sven Schreiber <svetosch@gmx.net>
To: Gretl development <gretl-devel@lists.wfu.edu>
Subject: [Gretl-devel] gretlcli termination (crash?) with gnuplot
        error
Message-ID: <265b39ea-5664-571a-6b8b-abe9f978fad6@gmx.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

Hi,

the following happened when running the awm.inp example file from the
SVAR addon on a console-only installation (Linux), within a "gretlcli"
session via gretl's 'run' command.

The awm.inp script must fail because it tries to send stuff to gnuplot
with the "display" option. That's understood. Here is some error output:

gnuplot stderr: '01:48:52 PM: Error: Unable to initialize GTK+, is
DISPLAY set properly?
Failed to initialize wxWidgets.
'
Failed command: 'gnuplot -persist "/home/gretlcheck/.gretl/gpttmp.plt"'

However, after that I don't get back to the gretlcli prompt ("?"), but
instead gretl(cli) terminates and I'm at the shell prompt. And I think
that's not right.
This is with current git.

thanks
sven


------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 14:49:01 +0100 (CET)
From: "Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti" <r.lucchetti@univpm.it>
To: Gretl development <gretl-devel@lists.wfu.edu>
Subject: Re: [Gretl-devel] gretlcli termination (crash?) with gnuplot
        error
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1902221448130.30721@joehenderson>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"; Format="flowed"

On Fri, 22 Feb 2019, Sven Schreiber wrote:

> Hi,
>
> the following happened when running the awm.inp example file from the SVAR
> addon on a console-only installation (Linux), within a "gretlcli" session via
> gretl's 'run' command.
>
> The awm.inp script must fail because it tries to send stuff to gnuplot with
> the "display" option. That's understood. Here is some error output:
>
> gnuplot stderr: '01:48:52 PM: Error: Unable to initialize GTK+, is DISPLAY
> set properly?
> Failed to initialize wxWidgets.
> '
> Failed command: 'gnuplot -persist "/home/gretlcheck/.gretl/gpttmp.plt"'
>
> However, after that I don't get back to the gretlcli prompt ("?"), but
> instead gretl(cli) terminates and I'm at the shell prompt. And I think that's
> not right.
> This is with current git.

Uhm, that's strange, things work ok here.

It look as if you're running a remote ssh session without X tunneling.

-------------------------------------------------------
   Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti
   Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali (DiSES)

   Universit? Politecnica delle Marche
   (formerly known as Universit? di Ancona)

   r.lucchetti@univpm.it
   http://www2.econ.univpm.it/servizi/hpp/lucchetti
-------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 15:03:14 +0100
From: Sven Schreiber <svetosch@gmx.net>
To: gretl-devel@lists.wfu.edu
Subject: Re: [Gretl-devel] gretlcli termination (crash?) with gnuplot
        error
Message-ID: <7c4bd26d-42a6-df93-adf3-1e385af0f31d@gmx.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed

Am 22.02.2019 um 14:49 schrieb Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti:
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2019, Sven Schreiber wrote:

>
> Uhm, that's strange, things work ok here.

Well, are you testing on a setup without desktop environment?

>
> It look as if you're running a remote ssh session without X tunneling.

This is actually on the Linux Subsystem for Windows or what it's called
(WSL), in the form of a Debian userspace. But even if it were ssh
without X tunnel, shouldn't gretl recover gracefully from that error?

The error per se or my setup here is obviously not terribly important.

cheers
sven


------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 14:09:57 +0000
From: "Pozdeev, Igor" <igor.pozdeev@unisg.ch>
To: "gretl-devel@lists.wfu.edu" <gretl-devel@lists.wfu.edu>
Subject: [Gretl-devel] signs in equation system restrictions
Message-ID: <d36e9d8b727948acba4f9b77fd793d30@unisg.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi all,

Behavior of restrictions with patterns like "b[1, 1] + -2*b[2, 1] = 0" is strange. In the following MWE, the restricted coefficients differ by exactly 1.0 when restrictions are defined in the "bugged" way:

open greene13_1.gdt

# set up system
system name="Grunfeld"
    equation I_GM const C_GM F_GM
    equation I_WE const C_WE F_WE
end system

# restriction w/bug
restrict "Grunfeld"
    b[1,1] + -1.0*b[2,1] = 0.0
end restrict

estimate "Grunfeld" method=sur --iterate

# restriction w/o bug
restrict "Grunfeld"
    b[1,1] - 1.0*b[2,1] = 0.0
end restrict

estimate "Grunfeld" method=sur -iterate

This a bug or a feature? Thanks for looking into this.

Best,
Igor


Igor Pozdeev
+41786120928
www.igorpozdeev.me<http://www.igorpozdeev.me/>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wfu.edu/pipermail/gretl-devel/attachments/20190222/09cf9881/attachment.html>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Gretl-devel mailing list
Gretl-devel@lists.wfu.edu
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-devel

End of Gretl-devel Digest, Vol 145, Issue 13
********************************************


--
Clive Nicholas

"My colleagues in the social sciences talk a great deal about methodology. I prefer to call it style." -- Freeman J. Dyson