On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 4:22 PM Sven Schreiber
<sven.schreiber@fu-berlin.de> wrote:

is the "no_const" specification for the ui-maker apparatus for a
function package GUI really working as intended? I seem to have a case
where I have a ui-maker function that requests no_const for a list
argument X, but I can execute the function with X = const alright. BTW,
X is set to have a "null" default, if that matters. Or does no_const
really mean that any constant term is removed quietly?

I don't have time to give a minimal example right now, but I could do so
on Friday or so, if necessary.

Please do. This may be redundant, but of course the "no_const"
specification only applies to GUI usage.

Will do, and yes, GUI context.

Another thing I think I just saw is that in the bundle-plot function of a package I had object identifiers that weren't declared. (copy-and-paste mistake) But I never got any gretl syntax error message about it; well, I haven't checked stderr, maybe that's where they went...

thanks

sven