May I also ask you which log of data Gretl makes?
I mean Log 10,Natural log etc...

And if there's an important difference in using one instead of another.

Thanks

S.


  
 
 


On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Allin Cottrell <cottrell@wfu.edu> wrote:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Simari wrote:

> Ok,
> can you please tell me why?
>
> I see the same result without the time trend as regressor.

Sorry, I'm now lost. If you're getting the results you were
hoping for, that's fine.

Allin Cottrell

> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Allin Cottrell <cottrell@wfu.edu> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Simari wrote:
>>
>>> Importing data (set on 1,2,3 instead of 13/06/2011,
>>> 14/06/2011 etc. on file Excel) importing them as cross
>>> section instead of series and then not adding the time trend
>>> I have the same result.
>>
>> You need to add the time trend and use it as a regressor.
>> The Excel dates are OK but they are not a "variable", they're
>> just an index of the observations.
>>
>> Allin Cottrell
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gretl-users mailing list
>> Gretl-users@lists.wfu.edu
>> http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users
>>
>

--
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University, NC

_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list
Gretl-users@lists.wfu.edu
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users