removing some of the parameters to be estimated 'fixes' the problem, oddly enough.
what we did is remove two of the parameters and the script run well.
we then put them back and removed two others, and the script ran as well.
that makes me wonder what is going on - if the problem was related to a specific series then this should not have happened.
any idea?

 
"I often see problems in the world and wonder why someone doesn't fix them. Then I realize that I am someone, and that makes me feel bad because it is all my fault."
http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/fixing_the_world/




From: Sven Schreiber <svetosch@gmx.net>
To: Gretl list <gretl-users@lists.wfu.edu>
Sent: Tue, December 8, 2009 11:25:31 AM
Subject: Re: [Gretl-users] using lags

Raz Lev schrieb:
> hi again,
>
> I am working on a script for a gmm estimation.
>
> some of my variables are used in lags in some of the equations of the
> model I am trying to estimate.
> When I try running the script I receive an error saying that missing
> values were encountered. I have checked (using ok) that the input series
> have no missing values in them.
>
> I therefore suspect this might be happening when trying to use the lag
> for the first observation in the series.
> Could this be the reason or does gretl 'know' how to handle this (skip
> the first observation maybe?)? If it could be the cause, any suggestions
> on handling it would be much appreciated.

I think you're right, so you would have to reduce the sample
accordingly. To verify that the assumption is correct, I suggest to do
this by hand. Later you could add something like

smpl --no-missing inputvar(-3)

or maybe

smpl +3 0
#(according to the help, this may not work, but I think it would be nice
if it did)

(and revert back to the old sample with 'smpl full')

See the built-in command help for smpl.

please report back if and what worked

cheers,
sven


_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list
Gretl-users@lists.wfu.edu
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users