As is well known, under normality, by equation ols is the same as system likelihood in ordinary vars.Stll, I don't know if analogue is true for pvars ((trend)-stationary, case I in Hsiao): Let we have pvar(1) with only x_it and y_it
If estimate dynamic panels for x_it on x_i(t-1) and y_i(t-1) and y_it on x_i(t-1) and y_i(t-1) separately is the same as system gmm,
almost only thing to do is organize bootstrap ci for irfs.
I think, two step approach for panel cointegration is a good thing, because without good shortcuts the general formula is intractable.
Resent survey by Canova: http://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp1507.pdf (Suspect, you know him personally)
This semester I have improbable 26 hours of lectures and labs per week, and spring will be completely empty. At last, I am
going to fini!
sh uk.po. I hope I know how to write heteroscedastic (cross-sectional) logit and probit and mfx for cross-sectional
probit. If it is desirable, I think I can manage functions for them.
--- Оригінальне повідомлення ---
Від кого: "Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti" <r.lucchetti@univpm.it>
Дата: 6 грудня 2014, 14:04:56
>> panel data VAR (as described in Hsiao, for example)
>
> don't know
We do have GMM estimators for dynamic linear models for panel data
(commonly known as GMM-DIF and GMM-SYS). It could be nice to package some
panel cointegration procedure: Pedroni's apporoach was based on two-step
estimation, which is clearly easily feasible with the techniques we
already have. I'm not aware of more recent methods in widespread use.
Ideas, anyone?
-------------------------------------------------------
Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti
Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali (DiSES)
Università Politecnica delle Marche
(formerly known as Università di Ancona)
r.lucchetti@univpm.it
http://www2.econ.univpm.it/servizi/hpp/lucchetti
-------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list
Gretl-users@lists.wfu.edu
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users