|
Rank |
Eigenvalue |
Trace |
p-value |
L-máx |
p-value |
|
0 |
0,11637 |
13,736 |
[0,3151] |
11,01 |
[0,2600] |
1 |
0,030163 |
2,7258 |
[0,6392] |
2,7258 |
[0,6380] |
Then I question to my self: if two
hypothesis are accepted, why we must conclude that there aren't any
cointegration relationships??? To conclude that I think we have to interpretate
sequently, that is, starting with the less rank, the first rank we accept
it will be the rank of cointegration, won´t it? In this case rank zero, doesn´t
it?
If the null hypothesis in L-max were that
there are exactly "r0" ( and no r<=r0 as the trace test)) cointegration
vectors, it would impossible the interpretation, because the rank
would be, at the same time, zero and one. In a lot of articles there is that
distintion between both tests.
I continue thinking that this
isn't very clear in Gretl
Cheerssssss and thanksss
Javi