Thanks for the explanation!

Am 27.01.2013 14:54, schrieb Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti:
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013, Sven Schreiber wrote:

Am 27.01.2013 12:43, schrieb Pindar:
Hi,

there is a strange behavior when combining the 'sd' function with matrices:
1) I thought it flags an error - is it now allowed for matrices?
2) the result is not correct, but the 'var' function works with this
simple matrix in the example

<hansl>
matrix test = {-0.08142857;0.05560000}
eval mcov(test)
eval var(test)
eval sqrt(mcov(test))
eval sqrt((test[1]-mean(test))^2 + (test[2]-mean(test))^2)
eval sd(test)
<hansl>



Without having verified numerically, I suspect this is an issue of 1/n
versus 1/(n-1). If so, then "correct" is not unique in this case; as you
know, the first is ML, the second is unbiased. In this extreme case of
n=2 this will lead to very different results (factor of 1/sqrt(2) I guess).

It is. If you eval sd(test)*sqrt(2), you get what you were looking for.

-------------------------------------------------------
  Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti
  Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali (DiSES)

  Università Politecnica delle Marche
  (formerly known as Università di Ancona)

  r.lucchetti@univpm.it
  http://www2.econ.univpm.it/servizi/hpp/lucchetti
-------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list
Gretl-users@lists.wfu.edu
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users