troubles with shared libraries under cygwin
by denis joubert
Hello,
I have problem compiling my own program under cygwin.
Building libgretl under cygwin seems to work like a charm. But it does
not create shared libraries (even with --enable-shared).
i use for example the quantreg function in my software and when runs
it crash and say :
...
No such file or directory
get_gretl_charset: using UTF-8
Couldn't load plugin function
model->errcode: 12
error message: Failed to load plugin: quantreg.so
...
(the model->errcode and message is printed with gretl functions handling errors)
I tried to force static linking in my software or with
--disable-shared and --enable-static...
but i found no way.
dear gretl-users, do i have any clue ?
thanks
13 years, 10 months
Re: [Gretl-users] Gretl-users Digest, Vol 41, Issue 6
by Julio Acuña
Thanks you so much guys!!
You're always helpful as usual!!
Have a great day!
> From: gretl-users-request(a)lists.wfu.edu
> Subject: Gretl-users Digest, Vol 41, Issue 6
> To: gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
> Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 12:00:02 -0400
>
> Send Gretl-users mailing list submissions to
> gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> gretl-users-request(a)lists.wfu.edu
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> gretl-users-owner(a)lists.wfu.edu
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Gretl-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Urgent question regarding Panel Regressions- Fixed and Random
> Effects (Julio Acu?a)
> 2. * * Urgent question regarding Panel Regressions- Fixed and
> Random Effect (Julio Acu?a)
> 3. Re: troubles with shared libraries under cygwin (denis joubert)
> 4. RES: * * Urgent question regarding Panel Regressions- Fixed
> and Random Effect (Bruno Thiago Tomio)
> 5. Re: * * Urgent question regarding Panel Regressions- Fixed
> and Random Effect (Sven Schreiber)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 11:04:22 -0600
> From: Julio Acu?a <neocell83(a)hotmail.com>
> Subject: [Gretl-users] Urgent question regarding Panel Regressions-
> Fixed and Random Effects
> To: <gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu>
> Message-ID: <COL112-W17844CCAA47DF737855600A6D50(a)phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
> https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://lists.wfu.edu/pipermail/gretl-users/attachments/20100607/35360545/...
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 11:12:25 -0600
> From: Julio Acu?a <neocell83(a)hotmail.com>
> Subject: [Gretl-users] * * Urgent question regarding Panel
> Regressions- Fixed and Random Effect
> To: <gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu>
> Message-ID: <COL112-W16BAA9EFDB56527BEF04FEA6D50(a)phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
> Sorry for the last email, dont know what went wrong.
>
> Here?s my quesitons:
>
> I?m running a panel regression, with 5 different units, 13 observations each for a total of nT=65.
>
> 1. When I test for fixed effects, the test results shows no fxed effects presents, thus common intercept. The thing is that with this regression everything is perfect: normally distributed errors, homescedastic erros, highly significant coefficiets, etc.
>
> With the above mentioned, according to theory I should be able to just run OLS ( pooled regrssion) because there are no fixed effects, But when I do that I get heterescedastic errors, i fix that but I have to modify my model afterwards.
>
>
> THe questions are:
> 1. Is panel regression using some kind of robust estimation technique? such as newey west cov matrix?
> 2. WHen I test for random effects i get the following message: "not enough degrees of freedom", are we using the standard hausman test for random effects?
>
> thanks for everyhtihng , salu2!!
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
> https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://lists.wfu.edu/pipermail/gretl-users/attachments/20100607/69885b41/...
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 23:46:21 +0200
> From: denis joubert <denis.joubert(a)gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Gretl-users] troubles with shared libraries under cygwin
> To: Gretl list <gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu>
> Message-ID:
> <AANLkTiklPJiwyquJxhTiQ2ldvJP1M1xegCLJO22ip0Dw(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Hi Allin,
> I tried to enable gui in order to build shared modules but it doesn't
> work with the present sources (checkout today).
> It failed on gui2/gtksourceview and no shared librairies can not be
> build into plugin (i tried launching make alone in this) and got this
> message again :
> "libtool: link: warning: undefined symbols not allowed in
> i686-pc-cygwin shared libraries"
> Are you on holiday yet ? hope it is/was good :-)
>
> best regards,
>
> Denis
>
> 2010/6/2 Allin Cottrell <cottrell(a)wfu.edu>:
> >
> > On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, denis joubert wrote:
> >
> >> the DLL are not compiled under the plugins directory, only .a
> >> and .la are created. It spoke about undefined references when
> >> attempting to create shared librairies in the build process. (i
> >> use --disable-gui )
> >
> > Sorry for the slow-motion responses, but I'm on holiday at
> > present. I suspect that --disable-gui is the problem here, since a
> > few of the plugins do in fact depend on GUI code. I'll have to do
> > some testing of the Windows build.
> >
> > Allin Cottrell
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gretl-users mailing list
> > Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
> > http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 21:48:38 -0300
> From: "Bruno Thiago Tomio" <bttomio(a)al.furb.br>
> Subject: [Gretl-users] RES: * * Urgent question regarding Panel
> Regressions- Fixed and Random Effect
> To: "'Gretl list'" <gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu>
> Message-ID: <81ECE8FD237D4F40A300C8D99EABBDAD@bruno>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Not a full answer, anyway:
>
> To run Hausman's test you need to have a number of cross-units higher than a
> number of variables.
>
> Good luck,
>
> Bruno Thiago Tomio
>
> _____
>
> De: gretl-users-bounces(a)lists.wfu.edu
> [mailto:gretl-users-bounces@lists.wfu.edu] Em nome de Julio Acu?a
> Enviada em: segunda-feira, 7 de junho de 2010 14:12
> Para: gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
> Assunto: [Gretl-users] * * Urgent question regarding Panel Regressions-
> Fixed and Random Effect
>
>
> Sorry for the last email, dont know what went wrong.
>
> Here?s my quesitons:
>
> I?m running a panel regression, with 5 different units, 13 observations each
> for a total of nT=65.
>
> 1. When I test for fixed effects, the test results shows no fxed effects
> presents, thus common intercept. The thing is that with this regression
> everything is perfect: normally distributed errors, homescedastic erros,
> highly significant coefficiets, etc.
>
> With the above mentioned, according to theory I should be able to just run
> OLS ( pooled regrssion) because there are no fixed effects, But when I do
> that I get heterescedastic errors, i fix that but I have to modify my
> model afterwards.
>
>
> THe questions are:
> 1. Is panel regression using some kind of robust estimation technique? such
> as newey west cov matrix?
> 2. WHen I test for random effects i get the following message: "not enough
> degrees of freedom", are we using the standard hausman test for random
> effects?
>
> thanks for everyhtihng , salu2!!
>
>
>
> _____
>
> Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now.
> <https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://lists.wfu.edu/pipermail/gretl-users/attachments/20100607/7f5a84ca/...
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 10:57:00 +0200
> From: Sven Schreiber <svetosch(a)gmx.net>
> Subject: Re: [Gretl-users] * * Urgent question regarding Panel
> Regressions- Fixed and Random Effect
> To: Gretl list <gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu>
> Message-ID: <4C0E05DC.7030808(a)gmx.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Am 07.06.2010 19:12, schrieb Julio Acu?a:
> > Sorry for the last email, dont know what went wrong.
> >
> > Here?s my quesitons:
> >
> > I?m running a panel regression, with 5 different units, 13 observations
> > each for a total of nT=65.
> >
>
> Standard panel methods are for "large N". This is not the case with your
> data. You still can put unit dummies in a standard regression equation,
> though, and continue from there.
>
> cheers,
> sven
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gretl-users mailing list
> Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
> http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users
>
> End of Gretl-users Digest, Vol 41, Issue 6
> ******************************************
_________________________________________________________________
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
13 years, 10 months
* * Urgent question regarding Panel Regressions- Fixed and Random Effect
by Julio Acuña
Sorry for the last email, dont know what went wrong.
Here´s my quesitons:
I´m running a panel regression, with 5 different units, 13 observations each for a total of nT=65.
1. When I test for fixed effects, the test results shows no fxed effects presents, thus common intercept. The thing is that with this regression everything is perfect: normally distributed errors, homescedastic erros, highly significant coefficiets, etc.
With the above mentioned, according to theory I should be able to just run OLS ( pooled regrssion) because there are no fixed effects, But when I do that I get heterescedastic errors, i fix that but I have to modify my model afterwards.
THe questions are:
1. Is panel regression using some kind of robust estimation technique? such as newey west cov matrix?
2. WHen I test for random effects i get the following message: "not enough degrees of freedom", are we using the standard hausman test for random effects?
thanks for everyhtihng , salu2!!
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
13 years, 10 months
making graphs through a loop
by artur bala
I want to create 5 times-series plot sequently using the "gnuplot"
command into a loop.
When I execute the loop commands one by one in gretl's console, gretl
comes up with 5 graphs, but when I run the script as a whole, gretl only
makes 5 .plt files. Is something wrong with that? How can I manage to
have my graphs from the script?
cheers,
artur
13 years, 10 months
ARMAX question
by lisa paul
Could someone explain to me the last bit of the ARMAX output? I would think it means that there's a unit root (or explosive), but when I run an augmented dickey-fuller test, it says no unit root...thanks!
Model 1:
ARMAX, using observations 1957:06-1979:08 (T = 267)
Estimated
using Kalman filter (exact ML)
Dependent
variable: Ratio
Standard
errors based on Hessian
coefficient std. error z p-value
---------------------------------------------------------
const 0.650441 0.0246480 26.39 1.83e-153 ***
phi_1 0.876993 0.0297168 29.51 2.04e-191 ***
var23 0.00235627 0.000457168 5.154 2.55e-07 ***
Mean
dependent var 0.735553 S.D. dependent var 0.083849
Mean of
innovations -0.000334 S.D. of
innovations 0.035214
Log-likelihood 513.8762 Akaike criterion -1019.752
Schwarz
criterion -1005.403 Hannan-Quinn -1013.989
Real Imaginary Modulus Frequency
-----------------------------------------------------------
AR Root 1 1.1403 0.0000 1.1403 0.0000
-----------------------------------------------------------
13 years, 10 months
inconsistency in PCA function
by Rebecca Zhang
Hi,
I got inconsistent results when running PCA using covariance matrix in gretl. Please see attached TSY_curve file for the data used. Please see attached PCA_problem file that illustrated the problem when verified with R.
The result highlighted in yellow is different from R result and appears in consistent with a reduced components result. I appreciate if you can look into it. Thank you.
Regards,
Rebecca
13 years, 10 months
ARIMA with season length of 3 months
by deepak bhatia
I am new to gretl and have been using the windows/UI version for a couple of
days now. Could someone help me understand how/where can I specify the
seasonal difference to be 3 or any number. The UI does not allow me to
specify a seasonal difference (lag) parameter (I am assuming that it
performs a 12 month seasonal difference when I specify a seasonal ARIMA
model by default).
13 years, 10 months
Models Table - ARMA Models
by Alejandro Mosiño
Hello all,
I don't know if there is a way to use the Models Table with ARMA models.
If not, do you know if there is a way to create a table of coefficients,
statistics, etc. of several models by using a script?
Best
13 years, 10 months
