troubles with shared libraries under cygwin
by denis joubert
Hello,
I have problem compiling my own program under cygwin.
Building libgretl under cygwin seems to work like a charm. But it does
not create shared libraries (even with --enable-shared).
i use for example the quantreg function in my software and when runs
it crash and say :
...
No such file or directory
get_gretl_charset: using UTF-8
Couldn't load plugin function
model->errcode: 12
error message: Failed to load plugin: quantreg.so
...
(the model->errcode and message is printed with gretl functions handling errors)
I tried to force static linking in my software or with
--disable-shared and --enable-static...
but i found no way.
dear gretl-users, do i have any clue ?
thanks
16 years
Re: [Gretl-users] Gretl-users Digest, Vol 41, Issue 6
by Julio Acuña
Thanks you so much guys!!
You're always helpful as usual!!
Have a great day!
> From: gretl-users-request(a)lists.wfu.edu
> Subject: Gretl-users Digest, Vol 41, Issue 6
> To: gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
> Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 12:00:02 -0400
>
> Send Gretl-users mailing list submissions to
> gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> gretl-users-request(a)lists.wfu.edu
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> gretl-users-owner(a)lists.wfu.edu
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Gretl-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Urgent question regarding Panel Regressions- Fixed and Random
> Effects (Julio Acu?a)
> 2. * * Urgent question regarding Panel Regressions- Fixed and
> Random Effect (Julio Acu?a)
> 3. Re: troubles with shared libraries under cygwin (denis joubert)
> 4. RES: * * Urgent question regarding Panel Regressions- Fixed
> and Random Effect (Bruno Thiago Tomio)
> 5. Re: * * Urgent question regarding Panel Regressions- Fixed
> and Random Effect (Sven Schreiber)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 11:04:22 -0600
> From: Julio Acu?a <neocell83(a)hotmail.com>
> Subject: [Gretl-users] Urgent question regarding Panel Regressions-
> Fixed and Random Effects
> To: <gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu>
> Message-ID: <COL112-W17844CCAA47DF737855600A6D50(a)phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
> https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://lists.wfu.edu/pipermail/gretl-users/attachments/20100607/35360545/...
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 11:12:25 -0600
> From: Julio Acu?a <neocell83(a)hotmail.com>
> Subject: [Gretl-users] * * Urgent question regarding Panel
> Regressions- Fixed and Random Effect
> To: <gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu>
> Message-ID: <COL112-W16BAA9EFDB56527BEF04FEA6D50(a)phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
> Sorry for the last email, dont know what went wrong.
>
> Here?s my quesitons:
>
> I?m running a panel regression, with 5 different units, 13 observations each for a total of nT=65.
>
> 1. When I test for fixed effects, the test results shows no fxed effects presents, thus common intercept. The thing is that with this regression everything is perfect: normally distributed errors, homescedastic erros, highly significant coefficiets, etc.
>
> With the above mentioned, according to theory I should be able to just run OLS ( pooled regrssion) because there are no fixed effects, But when I do that I get heterescedastic errors, i fix that but I have to modify my model afterwards.
>
>
> THe questions are:
> 1. Is panel regression using some kind of robust estimation technique? such as newey west cov matrix?
> 2. WHen I test for random effects i get the following message: "not enough degrees of freedom", are we using the standard hausman test for random effects?
>
> thanks for everyhtihng , salu2!!
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
> https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://lists.wfu.edu/pipermail/gretl-users/attachments/20100607/69885b41/...
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 23:46:21 +0200
> From: denis joubert <denis.joubert(a)gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Gretl-users] troubles with shared libraries under cygwin
> To: Gretl list <gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu>
> Message-ID:
> <AANLkTiklPJiwyquJxhTiQ2ldvJP1M1xegCLJO22ip0Dw(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Hi Allin,
> I tried to enable gui in order to build shared modules but it doesn't
> work with the present sources (checkout today).
> It failed on gui2/gtksourceview and no shared librairies can not be
> build into plugin (i tried launching make alone in this) and got this
> message again :
> "libtool: link: warning: undefined symbols not allowed in
> i686-pc-cygwin shared libraries"
> Are you on holiday yet ? hope it is/was good :-)
>
> best regards,
>
> Denis
>
> 2010/6/2 Allin Cottrell <cottrell(a)wfu.edu>:
> >
> > On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, denis joubert wrote:
> >
> >> the DLL are not compiled under the plugins directory, only .a
> >> and .la are created. It spoke about undefined references when
> >> attempting to create shared librairies in the build process. (i
> >> use --disable-gui )
> >
> > Sorry for the slow-motion responses, but I'm on holiday at
> > present. I suspect that --disable-gui is the problem here, since a
> > few of the plugins do in fact depend on GUI code. I'll have to do
> > some testing of the Windows build.
> >
> > Allin Cottrell
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gretl-users mailing list
> > Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
> > http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 21:48:38 -0300
> From: "Bruno Thiago Tomio" <bttomio(a)al.furb.br>
> Subject: [Gretl-users] RES: * * Urgent question regarding Panel
> Regressions- Fixed and Random Effect
> To: "'Gretl list'" <gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu>
> Message-ID: <81ECE8FD237D4F40A300C8D99EABBDAD@bruno>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Not a full answer, anyway:
>
> To run Hausman's test you need to have a number of cross-units higher than a
> number of variables.
>
> Good luck,
>
> Bruno Thiago Tomio
>
> _____
>
> De: gretl-users-bounces(a)lists.wfu.edu
> [mailto:gretl-users-bounces@lists.wfu.edu] Em nome de Julio Acu?a
> Enviada em: segunda-feira, 7 de junho de 2010 14:12
> Para: gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
> Assunto: [Gretl-users] * * Urgent question regarding Panel Regressions-
> Fixed and Random Effect
>
>
> Sorry for the last email, dont know what went wrong.
>
> Here?s my quesitons:
>
> I?m running a panel regression, with 5 different units, 13 observations each
> for a total of nT=65.
>
> 1. When I test for fixed effects, the test results shows no fxed effects
> presents, thus common intercept. The thing is that with this regression
> everything is perfect: normally distributed errors, homescedastic erros,
> highly significant coefficiets, etc.
>
> With the above mentioned, according to theory I should be able to just run
> OLS ( pooled regrssion) because there are no fixed effects, But when I do
> that I get heterescedastic errors, i fix that but I have to modify my
> model afterwards.
>
>
> THe questions are:
> 1. Is panel regression using some kind of robust estimation technique? such
> as newey west cov matrix?
> 2. WHen I test for random effects i get the following message: "not enough
> degrees of freedom", are we using the standard hausman test for random
> effects?
>
> thanks for everyhtihng , salu2!!
>
>
>
> _____
>
> Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now.
> <https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://lists.wfu.edu/pipermail/gretl-users/attachments/20100607/7f5a84ca/...
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 10:57:00 +0200
> From: Sven Schreiber <svetosch(a)gmx.net>
> Subject: Re: [Gretl-users] * * Urgent question regarding Panel
> Regressions- Fixed and Random Effect
> To: Gretl list <gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu>
> Message-ID: <4C0E05DC.7030808(a)gmx.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Am 07.06.2010 19:12, schrieb Julio Acu?a:
> > Sorry for the last email, dont know what went wrong.
> >
> > Here?s my quesitons:
> >
> > I?m running a panel regression, with 5 different units, 13 observations
> > each for a total of nT=65.
> >
>
> Standard panel methods are for "large N". This is not the case with your
> data. You still can put unit dummies in a standard regression equation,
> though, and continue from there.
>
> cheers,
> sven
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gretl-users mailing list
> Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
> http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users
>
> End of Gretl-users Digest, Vol 41, Issue 6
> ******************************************
_________________________________________________________________
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
16 years
* * Urgent question regarding Panel Regressions- Fixed and Random Effect
by Julio Acuña
Sorry for the last email, dont know what went wrong.
Here´s my quesitons:
I´m running a panel regression, with 5 different units, 13 observations each for a total of nT=65.
1. When I test for fixed effects, the test results shows no fxed effects presents, thus common intercept. The thing is that with this regression everything is perfect: normally distributed errors, homescedastic erros, highly significant coefficiets, etc.
With the above mentioned, according to theory I should be able to just run OLS ( pooled regrssion) because there are no fixed effects, But when I do that I get heterescedastic errors, i fix that but I have to modify my model afterwards.
THe questions are:
1. Is panel regression using some kind of robust estimation technique? such as newey west cov matrix?
2. WHen I test for random effects i get the following message: "not enough degrees of freedom", are we using the standard hausman test for random effects?
thanks for everyhtihng , salu2!!
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
16 years
making graphs through a loop
by artur bala
I want to create 5 times-series plot sequently using the "gnuplot"
command into a loop.
When I execute the loop commands one by one in gretl's console, gretl
comes up with 5 graphs, but when I run the script as a whole, gretl only
makes 5 .plt files. Is something wrong with that? How can I manage to
have my graphs from the script?
cheers,
artur
16 years
ARMAX question
by lisa paul
Could someone explain to me the last bit of the ARMAX output? I would think it means that there's a unit root (or explosive), but when I run an augmented dickey-fuller test, it says no unit root...thanks!
Model 1:
ARMAX, using observations 1957:06-1979:08 (T = 267)
Estimated
using Kalman filter (exact ML)
Dependent
variable: Ratio
Standard
errors based on Hessian
coefficient std. error z p-value
---------------------------------------------------------
const 0.650441 0.0246480 26.39 1.83e-153 ***
phi_1 0.876993 0.0297168 29.51 2.04e-191 ***
var23 0.00235627 0.000457168 5.154 2.55e-07 ***
Mean
dependent var 0.735553 S.D. dependent var 0.083849
Mean of
innovations -0.000334 S.D. of
innovations 0.035214
Log-likelihood 513.8762 Akaike criterion -1019.752
Schwarz
criterion -1005.403 Hannan-Quinn -1013.989
Real Imaginary Modulus Frequency
-----------------------------------------------------------
AR Root 1 1.1403 0.0000 1.1403 0.0000
-----------------------------------------------------------
16 years
inconsistency in PCA function
by Rebecca Zhang
Hi,
I got inconsistent results when running PCA using covariance matrix in gretl. Please see attached TSY_curve file for the data used. Please see attached PCA_problem file that illustrated the problem when verified with R.
The result highlighted in yellow is different from R result and appears in consistent with a reduced components result. I appreciate if you can look into it. Thank you.
Regards,
Rebecca
16 years
ARIMA with season length of 3 months
by deepak bhatia
I am new to gretl and have been using the windows/UI version for a couple of
days now. Could someone help me understand how/where can I specify the
seasonal difference to be 3 or any number. The UI does not allow me to
specify a seasonal difference (lag) parameter (I am assuming that it
performs a 12 month seasonal difference when I specify a seasonal ARIMA
model by default).
16 years
Models Table - ARMA Models
by Alejandro Mosiño
Hello all,
I don't know if there is a way to use the Models Table with ARMA models.
If not, do you know if there is a way to create a table of coefficients,
statistics, etc. of several models by using a script?
Best
16 years
