Welcome to the best scientific community!
I have cleaned up your files, turning them into EN data. You can import
them in Gretl with no problems.
I can confirm the bug you found.
To produce "nice" values you should first compact from Daily to Weekly data
(with "last"), next from Weekly to Monthly, and finally from Monthly to
Annual.
Bye,
Hélio
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Allin Cottrell <cottrell(a)wfu.edu> wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jan 2015, Wingenroth, Thorsten wrote:
first of all: I think Gretl is great. Just what I had looking for my
> students and myself. Clean, fast, easy, powerful but - most of all - a nice
> user interface. That's what R is missing.
>
Thanks, glad you like it!
That said [...]
>
> The menu item for compacting series does not work correctly. Although the
> option "last" is specified in the attributes, another method to compact is
> used. In contrast, if you use the command line interface, everything works
> fine.
>
Thanks for the report. I see the problem, and it's specific to running two
compaction steps: daily to monthly then monthly to annual. I've found the
source of the problem and fixed it in CVS; fixed snapshots will follow
tomorrow.
If you want to try out yourself, just try to compact these two files via
> the menu to a frequency of 1 year. A lot of data gets lost at the beginning
> of the series.
>
One thing to note is that your DAX CSV file is not suitable for
importation to gretl as it stands. You can't include a thousands separator
in such a file. (When I experimented with it I had to open it in a text
editor and delete all instances of '.'.) All the supposedly numerical
values such as "10.666,43" (meaning, I take it, 10 thousand, six hundred
and sixty six point four three) are read as string variables since gretl
can't make any numerical sense of such constructions with two bits of
punctuation.
Allin Cottrell
_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list
Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users