[Gretl-users] Re: efficient duplication matrix?
Am 03.01.21 um 10:05 schrieb Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti:
On Sat, 2 Jan 2021, Sven Schreiber wrote:
> Am 02.01.2021 um 18:46 schrieb Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti:
>> On Sat, 2 Jan 2021, Sven Schreiber wrote:
>>
>>> Perhaps we should add this to 'extra' as well?
>>
>> Sure, why not. Here's a version that encompasses the present discussion:
>>
On a more general note: the more I think about it, the more I feel
inclined to factor out all those functions from extra.gfn in favour of a
separate matrix_extra.gfn package, or something like that.
I was also thinking about something similar. I think it's helpful to
isolate common things into separate packages given that we've already
collected so many useful functions.
I would suggest a naming convention such as extra_<TYPE>.gfn. The user
would see all "extra" packages in a row, and realize that there is a
series of extra things written by the Gretl Team.
Artur