Am 06.12.2021 um 16:51 schrieb francesco.delledonne(a)unicredit.eu:
Thanks Riccardo,
I can nevertheless see that the "byhand" calculation is consistent with
theory.
By running your script i get the following:
PC1 PC2 fac1 fac2
1 -2.709256 0.285568 -854.063 -0.26550
2 -2.066726 0.463805 -662.994 -2.01606
3 -1.980962 0.517025 -616.468 -2.60151
4 -0.078544 -0.938229 -335.217 -13.89559
5 -1.666011 0.657474 -318.786 34.83377
6 -0.451584 -0.754696 -162.769 2.05259
7 0.432158 -0.885727 -114.351 16.87650
8 0.087436 -0.349262 -33.981 -52.69935
9 0.327963 -0.744697 20.738 25.60055
10 -0.276806 -0.689980 32.923 32.34589
11 1.754006 -0.244259 349.105 -19.51842
12 1.454298 2.304822 708.354 -90.62917
13 2.519187 0.173682 895.401 16.20702
14 2.654839 0.204476 1092.108 53.70929
Quite different
Are you sure you're running the exact script unchanged? If you are, then
please tell us your setup, because you're getting weird stuff.
thanks
sven