I can't replicate this problem. Could you give me an example I could
try running? Thanks.
(I'll try to get to the accompanying feature request before long.)
Allin
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Koray Simsek <korays(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Allin,
Thanks for quickly acting on this, but when I installed the current
snapshot, I noticed that the coint Steps 1,2, and 4 completely disappeared.
Here's what my output looks like when I run coint with --verbose:
Step 1: testing for a unit root in X1
Step 2: testing for a unit root in X2
Step 3: cointegrating regression
Cointegrating regression -
OLS, using observations 2012-12-14:2013-12-13 (T = 250)
Dependent variable: X1
coefficient std. error t-ratio p-value
---------------------------------------------------------
const 0.331381 0.119003 2.785 0.0058 ***
X2 0.932445 0.0138352 67.40 1.83e-161 ***
Mean dependent var 8.297023 S.D. dependent var 0.962697
Sum squared resid 11.94726 S.E. of regression 0.219487
R-squared 0.948229 Adjusted R-squared 0.948020
Log-likelihood 25.38522 Akaike criterion −46.77044
Schwarz criterion −39.72752 Hannan-Quinn −43.93587
rho 0.912250 Durbin-Watson 0.174442
Step 4: testing for a unit root in uhat
There is evidence for a cointegrating relationship if:
(a) The unit-root hypothesis is not rejected for the individual variables,
and
(b) the unit-root hypothesis is rejected for the residuals (uhat) from the
cointegrating regression.