I am not an expert in the field, and this is the advice I was given.
On 01/03/2015, Sven Schreiber <svetosch(a)gmx.net> wrote:
Am 01.03.2015 um 17:37 schrieb Mark Scerri:
> HI,
> I am rather new to time series analysis. I am trying to perform a unit
> root test. I have been advised to perform the test on three cases.
> Case 1: no constant term or time trend; True process is a random walk.
> Case 2: constant term but no time trend: true process is a random walk.
here the constant term is only needed for the alternative hypothesis
> Case 3: constant term but no time trend; true process is a random walk
> with drift.
here the constant is also needed for the null, because with a unit root
it cumulates to a drift (=linear time trend term).
But this case makes no sense really for testing. Because if you specify
the null as containing a drift/trend, it is almost surely nonsense to
not allow a trend under the alternative (trend stationarity). So are you
sure that's really what you were asked to do?
-sven
_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list
Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users