Am 30.11.2008 19:48, Allin Cottrell schrieb:
 On Sun, 30 Nov 2008, Charles Ward wrote:
 
> I ran a ADF test in gretl and in R.
>
> (The regression was no constant, LNEG lagged once, d_LNEG lag1 and d_LNEG
> lag2)
> In gretl and R, the results were for most purposes identical for all numbers
> for Z and d_LNEG lag 1
>
> In gretl the results for d_LNEG lag2 were
>                     coefficient   std. error   t-ratio   p-value
> d_LNEG_2   -0.470623     0.126295     -3.726    0.2006
> But in R the results were
> z.diff.lag2      -0.47062      0.12629       -3.726    0.00053
>
> Which is correct?
 
 Thank you for spotting this.  The p-value given by gretl for the
 second lag of LNEG was incorrect: in fact it was the Dickey-Fuller
 p-value for the first lag of LNEG, printed in the wrong place.
  
But for the case of ADF without constant IIRC the p-value for the
ADF-t=-3.7 would be much lower than 0.20, no?
-sven