Re: [Gretl-users] Forwarded message from Allan Bart
I am not sure about functionality but I can say that gretl is more
accurate on multiple fronts based on my own calculations (forthcoming)
and those of McCullough (1999).
Ref:
--McCullough, B. D. (1999c), Econometric software reliability: Eviews,
LIMDEP, SHAZAM and TSP, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 14, 191–202.
--Yalta A. T. and A. Y. Yalta, GRETL 1.6.0 and Its Numerical Accuracy,
Journal of Applied Econometrics, forthcoming.
On 7/20/06, Allin Cottrell <cottrell(a)wfu.edu> wrote:
For some reason the following got posted to gretl-users-bounces;
I'm sending it on to the list. Anyone familiar with Shazam?
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 12:27:21 -0400
From: Allan_Bart(a)ibi.com
To: gretl-users-bounces(a)ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu
Subject: The practice of Economeytics Judge and Hill
Hello,
I own this book and I was wondering if Gretl is up to
the state of Shazam of a couple years ago.
Allan Bart
_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list
Gretl-users(a)ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu
http://ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users
--
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy
enough people to make it worth the effort. - Herm Allbright
(1876-1944)
--