On Thu, 4 Jun 2015, Koray Simsek wrote:
Dear Allin,
I am sorry that the two lines I sent in my original post do not replicate
the issue in the current snapshot as they were run in an older gretl where
MAIC was used as the test-down criteria and selected a smaller lag value
for test-down in LRM.
Sven explained my point perfectly. If you run ADF for LRY (not LRM) as
follows, you'll notice that AIC below the regression output is different
from the AIC for k=0 in the test-down procedure. This is because the
regression is run on the full-sample whereas the test-down is done for the
lag 5 compatible sample.
OK, thanks, now I see. This should be fixed in current CVS and
snapshots.
Allin Cottrell