It was designed for model-like classes of objects
I didn't expected it would work with "forecast" class objects
It was unintending pleasant side effect
RforecastL("rwf(LRM,h=4)",X,1,1) # for objects of class "forecast"
horizon is ignored
# and should be given inside "mod" argument
# gives 4 steps
10 жовтня 2015, 04:05:11, від "Allin Cottrell" <cottrell(a)wfu.edu>:
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015, oleg_komashko(a)ukr.net wrote:
[...]
Thanks for the positive comments on gretl that I have ellipsized.
(But you're changing the thread topic once again!)
> [B]ut it's not proper if a GNU product can do less on Linux
> [than it can do on MS Windows].
I can agree with that. Anything gretl can do on Windows it should be
able to do on Linux -- and also vice versa, since it seems that
(like it or not) most gretl users are still on Windows.
However, it seems to me that you just "got lucky" in being able to
produce plots via R, running under gretl's "foreign" apparatus on
Windows XP. I wouldn't expect this to work in general on any
platform -- it's seriously stretching what "foreign" can do, and I
would again suggest that you try a different approach, please!
(I'd also be interested to know if after this plotting episode on XP
you end up with zombie background processes running, as I did after
trying your hansl script on Fedora Linux: it "worked" insofar as it
put an R plot on screen, but it messed up the process table.)
Allin Cottrell
_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list
Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users