Well if it makes any sense in your context, maybe you could restrict the
sample "manually" (= --no-missing) and then apply GMM. Haven't tested
this though.
hth,
sven
Am 10/26/2011 10:00 AM, schrieb Anutechia Asongu:
 Hi All,
            Can't one-step GMM that is compatible with TSLS be performed
 with missing values?. Indeed I'm using TSLS and should like to use
 one-step GMM for robustness test. Please is there a way one can
 turn-around this "missing values encountered....." spectre that keeps
 hunting me?
 
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
 *From:* Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti <r.lucchetti(a)univpm.it>
 *To:* Gretl list <gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu>
 *Sent:* Wednesday, October 26, 2011 9:27 AM
 *Subject:* Re: [Gretl-users] Linear Regression
 
 On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Sven Schreiber wrote:
 
> b is the coefficient -- if you have trouble finding it in the output, I
> predict some wonderful weeks ahead for you in which you will discover
> the beautiful world of econometrics.
 
 :-D
 
> As for the different R2, you would need to post an example. This stuff
> is so standard that I'm willing to bet a large amount of money that if
> you compare the correct numbers, they will be the same. My first guess
> is different effective samples.
 
 Or perhaps, constant/no constant.
 
 
 Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti
 Dipartimento di Economia
 Università Politecnica delle Marche
 
 r.lucchetti(a)univpm.it <mailto:r.lucchetti@univpm.it>
 
http://www.econ.univpm.it/lucchetti
 _______________________________________________
 Gretl-users mailing list
 Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu <mailto:Gretl-users@lists.wfu.edu>
 
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users
 
 
 
 _______________________________________________
 Gretl-users mailing list
 Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
 
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users