Well if it makes any sense in your context, maybe you could restrict the
sample "manually" (= --no-missing) and then apply GMM. Haven't tested
this though.
hth,
sven
Am 10/26/2011 10:00 AM, schrieb Anutechia Asongu:
Hi All,
Can't one-step GMM that is compatible with TSLS be performed
with missing values?. Indeed I'm using TSLS and should like to use
one-step GMM for robustness test. Please is there a way one can
turn-around this "missing values encountered....." spectre that keeps
hunting me?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti <r.lucchetti(a)univpm.it>
*To:* Gretl list <gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu>
*Sent:* Wednesday, October 26, 2011 9:27 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Gretl-users] Linear Regression
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Sven Schreiber wrote:
> b is the coefficient -- if you have trouble finding it in the output, I
> predict some wonderful weeks ahead for you in which you will discover
> the beautiful world of econometrics.
:-D
> As for the different R2, you would need to post an example. This stuff
> is so standard that I'm willing to bet a large amount of money that if
> you compare the correct numbers, they will be the same. My first guess
> is different effective samples.
Or perhaps, constant/no constant.
Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti
Dipartimento di Economia
Università Politecnica delle Marche
r.lucchetti(a)univpm.it <mailto:r.lucchetti@univpm.it>
http://www.econ.univpm.it/lucchetti
_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list
Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu <mailto:Gretl-users@lists.wfu.edu>
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users
_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list
Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users