Am 11.08.2023 um 12:15 schrieb Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti:
On 10/08/2023 20:21, Alecos Papadopoulos wrote:
>
>> To address endogeneity in the model, a set of four instruments, is
>> introduced. Two instruments (Z1 and Z2) are employed to instrument
>> for X1, while two other instruments (Z3 and Z4) are used to
>> instrument for X2.
>> My question is: How Gretl understand which instrument stands for
>> which endogenous variable?
From an econometric point of view, there is an ambiguity in the
original post that must be resolved before explaining how to do things
in gretl, as Alecos rightly pointed out.
A common misconception in IV estimation is that a given instrument is
related to a given endogenous variable. This is by no means true in
general. Generally speaking, ALL instruments are used for ALL
endogenous variables.
Having said this, it is perfectly possible to impose constraints in
the "first-stage" regression, for example by stipulating that some of
the instruments don't enter some of the equations. But in order to do
so, you can't rely on the plain IV estimator and you have to use a
different estimator (maximum likelihood, or possibly GMM).
Jack is of course perfectly right, but I believe that for the actual
estimation no other estimator than standard IV is wanted here. It seems
to me that the real-world question is: "Hm, I believe Z1 and Z2 will be
good instruments for X1, can I convince my audience that this is true?"
And so one could present the pseudo-1st-stage just for X1, to check the
fit and so on. But once this auxiliary regression shows satisfactory
results (and maybe do the same thing for X2 as well), you just want run
the full standard IV regression.
cheers
sven