Am 22.09.2013 11:53, schrieb Artur T.:
Am 15.09.2013 01:52, schrieb Allin Cottrell:
> On Sat, 14 Sep 2013, Artur T. wrote:
>
>> I just had an idea. As I am not a programmer, I do not know how
>> tricky/difficult such things are to program. But if one could implement
>> a multicore support for the join function, more than one variable could
>> be read in simultaneously which speeds up the process.
>
> Worth thinking about, but paralellizing join would be quite
> complicated.
>
> In the meantime, I think that you should find that the speed
> improvement for join in current CSV is very substantial and makes it
> feasible to use join in a loop for multiple series (even with big
> data) without taking forever.
Mmmhh, I couldn't figure out any substantial speed improvement on my old
PC here. But I did some testing on more modern machines, and actually it
seems to works quite reasonable there. I guess my machine is just too
slow to expect some faster processing :-)
Well, there is the Stata benchmark you mentioned which is a natural
competitor. I'd say if your machine is fast enough to do it with Stata
the goal should be that it also works reasonably well with gretl. So
how's that comparison now after the accelerations in gretl?
cheers,
sven