Dear Allin,
Probably a year ago you posted script to test max lag in ADF using
AIC or BIC or HQC criteria. I have trouble locating it the group archive.
Can you dig this out ? I would be very grateful.
All the best,
Davor
On 18.3.2011. 14:04, Allin Cottrell wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, Henrique Andrade wrote:
> I would suggest a change in the ADF test (through the GUI). When Gretl asks
> for the lag order I think it would be nice to put a default value for the
> lag order (also leaving the option "test down from maximum lag order")
> selected by default.
>
> Looking at EViews (ADF test) and R (Phillips-Perron test), I'd discovered
> that they use the following default, as suggested by Schwert (Tests for Unit
> Roots: A Monte Carlo Investigation, Journal of Business& Economic
> Statistics, 1989, p.9):
>
> *scalar adf_lag = int(12*($nobs/100)^(1/4))*
I'm not opposed to doing something like that. What do others
think? (Right now we just offer a default of 1 for the ADF
lag-length, and leave it up to the user to raise the order, and to
select the option of testing down from some maximum order.)
Allin Cottrell
_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list
Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users