Re: [Gretl-users] Menu re-structuring
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Cristian Rigamonti wrote:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 08:38:25AM -0400, Allin Cottrell wrote:
>
> *IF* we have agreement that the current trial setup for the
> menus is an improvement, and that it's a setup we can live with
> for a while (we don't want to make such changes too often), I'd
> be inclined to go ahead with it.
I'd suggest to give people a couple of days to experiment with
the current CVS version (to me it seems ok); maybe someone
could come up with some further requirements.
Yes, let's "sleep on it" for a couple of days. I have to say
that I rather like the new layout already. The main thing that
still seems a bit illogical or clunky is to do with the
Data and Sample menus:
* As Cri said, the dataset-restructuring items really shouldn't
be under "Sample"; "Data" would be more appropriate.
* But, as I've said, putting them there overburdens "Data".
* This could be got around if we had a separate menu tree
dedicated to "descriptive statistics and graphs", but people
seemed to like the idea of reducing the number of menu trees,
and I'm not sure what a snappy title for the notional added tree
would be ("View"?).
Allin.