Just when I was starting to think that I am becoming good at LaTeX, I
now see how I still have a lot to learn :-) Thanks for the
explanations.
Sincerely,
Talha
On 4/10/07, Allin Cottrell <cottrell(a)wfu.edu> wrote:
 On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Talha Yalta wrote:
 > I have been using the TeX export functionality of gretl, which
 > is very useful. I also noticed some problems. I don't know if
 > these are bugs but I wanted to report nonetheless:
 >
 > 1- In the TeX file of the model tables I see the
 > "\footnotesize{}" command before each item in each cell, which
 > makes the table difficult to read and touch up in LaTeX.
 > Wouldn't it be better if there was \begin{footnotesize} and
 > \end{footnotesize} at the beginning and the end of the table?
 No. The "footnotesize" specification is not used in every cell.
 It is used to make the standard errors (or t-ratios) smaller than
 the coefficients.
 > 2- In some cells I have "$\,\,$" or $\,$. I am not sure what
 > these are for (I just erease these).
 In TeX "\," is a "thinspace".  This is used to improve spacing
 when the default is not ideal.  Typsetting a regression equation
 is not a standard TeX task, and I find that these extra spaces are
 desirable.
 > 3- Instead of the "$-$0.7971$^{**}$" format, wouldn't it be
 > better for all the cells containing numbers to just be in the
 > formula mode such as $-0.7971^{**}$ ?
 No, that would produce undesirable results for very large and very
 small coefficients, where the C library's "printf()" produces
 representations such as "2.456e-06".  The exponent part looks
 quite wrong if the entire number is in TeX math mode (it seems as
 if "e" is a variable).
 > 4- After experimenting a little bit, I now see that 6 models is
 > what can be fit in a portrait page. Still, could you please make
 > it 8 or even 12? I know 6 will be enough for most purposes
 > however: a)- there might be need for more than 6 in some cases
 > (right now I need 8) b)- Even though more than 6 is difficult to
 > fit in a portrait page, it is possible to choose a landscpe page
 > later (would be even better if there was an option for this in
 > TeX export options).
 A landscape option would be good, I agree.  I'll take a look at
 the other possibilities too.
 > 5- Request: I don't know how difficult this is to implement but
 > exporting a table in a way where all &'s are vertically alligned
 > would make it easier to read and edit in TeX later...
 I see how that could be useful.  It would be quite tedious to
 code, I'm afraid! ;-)
 Allin.
 _______________________________________________
 Gretl-users mailing list
 Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
 
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users
 
-- 
"Money won't buy happiness, but it will pay the salaries of a large
research staff to study the problem." - Bill Vaughan
--