Re: [Gretl-users] issue with fctstats()

Am 15.04.2016 um 10:15 schrieb Artur T.: > I am not sure this behavior is intended, but to me it looks some > unintended behavior. > > In the following example one of the scalars in the vector of realized > values y is zero which drives the division "(e./y)=-inf" and which > affects the later sum calculation as well. I guess gretl should ignore > this "-inf"-value, or do I miss anything here? > I've had the same problem in the past, but my conclusion was that it's basically unavoidable given the definitions of some of the FC eval measures. I cooked up my own alternative forecast measure function back then, which I could share (after I've found it). cheers, sven