With so many instruments the only thing that gets better is this Sargan test, but the
coefficients are nonsense!
Roodman 2009 helps, thanks for thd hint.
I gonna try the method with a subs ample. I want to know, why it's not working as
expected...
Thanks so far!
Leon
Am 22.05.2013 um 22:06 schrieb "Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti"
<r.lucchetti(a)univpm.it>:
On Wed, 22 May 2013, Pindar wrote:
> Ok, I see, the 20% cannot be the right p- value. Does someone use Stata to check what
the newest xtabond2 says?
>
> U seem to have some experience with dpanel estimation. What do u think about that: If
I have a 12x412 panel is it then ok to use 225 instruments or should one stay near 100
instruments?
If you ask me, 225 orthogonality conditions is a sure recipe for disaster, unless you
have 10 billion observations or more. The conventional wisdom among practitioners is that
should never use all available instruments when doing panel GMM, unless your T is very
small. You may want to read Roodman (2009), Oxford Bulletin.
-------------------------------------------------------
Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti
Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali (DiSES)
Università Politecnica delle Marche
(formerly known as Università di Ancona)
r.lucchetti(a)univpm.it
http://www2.econ.univpm.it/servizi/hpp/lucchetti
-------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list
Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users