Re: [Gretl-users] Gretl error/crash
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, (s) Simon Grenville-Wood wrote:
You would be correct; I have something in the area of 93,000
observations.
Thanks for your quick response, I'll continue to try to find
a way around this!
You could try de-meaning the data instead of creating a vast
number of dummies.
series dmx = x - pmean(x)
Allin Cottrell