Re: [Gretl-users] building Lapack for Gretl
On Mon, 3 Jan 2011, Bob McCall wrote:
But do I need to build the the complex routines? Using your
configure script (thanks!) with:
--disable-single --disable-complex
fails in "make check", there are unresolved references in the complex*16
routines.
Sorry, I misunderstood your question. Yes, all gretl needs is the
double-precision real functionality from lapack. But, as you say,
the "check" routines can get tricky when you build lapack with a
subset of the supported types.
Allin Cottrell