Thank you, its very interesting
I think main developers never get into the trap of choosing me as main determiner of gretl
priorities. I modestly hoped to tell something useful. As for propositions for myself,
functions packages could be not main priorities for gretl, but at least they should be
useful. For the first try it is convenient to do something simple. Personally I decided
first to submit robust version of RESET as in Wooldridge. I wrote it in R and tested it
against the data with answers. So I should only translate. I maintain a tiny R package
with the only function which performs Wald tests for nonlinear restrictions and
participate in more established Sample selection project as junior. I intentionally chose
tiny thing for a start because I didn't knew pitfalls of submitting. I use R and
gretl for different students, so I am interested in improvement of the both. Current R
capabilities for microeconometrics do not satisfy me, especially the way marginal effects
are calculated. I am writi!
ng my own microeconometric package. I borrowed something from gretl. From the other side
I have something to translate from R into gretl (marginal effects).
As for fixed effects probit, it may be bad, I just think its non-existence is too strong
statement. Dear Sven, you opinion is very valuable for me. It's very difficult to find
someone to discuss such problems here in Kiev Best, Oleh
--- Оригінальне повідомлення ---
Від кого: "Sven Schreiber" <svetosch(a)gmx.net>
Дата: 7 грудня 2014, 12:44:14
Am 07.12.2014 um 00:13 schrieb oleg_komashko(a)ukr.net :
To be honest, some of the negative remarks on that page sound like my
own thoughts before I had really learned and understood the theory. I
would not recommend to follow that advice. Also, if you take it
seriously that fixed effects are bad because you are left only with the
within information, you're (=the author of the page) missing the point I
think.
Methods for bias reduction
1. Jinyong Hahn and
2. Whitney Newey
3.
Jackknife and Analytical Bias Reduction for Nonlinear Panel Models
Eco nometrica Volume 72, Issue
4,<
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecta.2004.72.issue-4/issuetoc >pages
1295–1319,July 2004
When I wrote "don't know" I only meant that I wasn't sure about exactly
what's available in gretl or in function packages. Of course there is a
large literature out there for all kinds of problems and how to do
specialized things. Anybody is welcome to implement these things (as
function packages) but it's not clear (to me) why it should be a
priority, because it's of course only a partial solution to the probit
fixed effects bias.
cheers,
sven
_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list
Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users