On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 09:07:10AM -0400, Allin Cottrell wrote:
* This could be got around if we had a separate menu tree
dedicated to "descriptive statistics and graphs", but people
seemed to like the idea of reducing the number of menu trees,
and I'm not sure what a snappy title for the notional added tree
would be ("View"?).
Well, "View" seems a reasonable choice, it parallels the "Add" menu
tree.
If the number of top-level menus is really a problem (personally, I don't think
so), another option could be to transform the "Add" and "View"
branches into
submenus of the "Data" menu, as in:
Data
Add
(current content of "Add")
View
Graph specified vars
--------------------
Multiple graphs
--------------------
Summary statistics
--------------------
Correlation matrix
--------------------
Multivariate statistics
-------------------------
Display values
Edit values
Add observations
Remove extra observations
-------------------------
Read info
Edit info
Print description
Add case markers
Remove case markers
-------------------------
But IMHO this solution would have an excessive degree of nesting (which I
dislike more than the overall number of toplevel menus).
My preferred solution would be the following:
Data
Display values
Edit values
Add observations
Remove extra observations
-------------------------
Read info
Edit info
Print description
Add case markers
Remove case markers
---------------------
Dataset structure \
Compact data | Items moved here from "Sample"
Expand data |
Transpose data /
Add
(current content)
View
Graph specified vars \
-------------------- |
Multiple graphs |
-------------------- | Items moved here from "Data"
Summary statistics |
-------------------- |
Correlation matrix |
-------------------- /
Multivariate statistics
Sample
Set range
Restore full range
------------------
Define based on dummy
Restrict based on criterion
Random subsample
-----------------
Drop all obs with missing values
Count missing values
Set missing value code
Notes:
- We'd have 8 top level menus instead of 7 (doesn't seem a big problem to me,
given that the overall structure is way more intuitive)
File | Tools | Data | Add | View | Sample | Variable | Model
(by the way, is this the "right" order? or it may be improved?)
- The "Data" menu would not be overcrowded (13 items instead of 14)
- All the commands that modify the dataset would be under "Data", not under
"Sample" (I guess you know I'm obsessioned by that! :)
Opinions?
Cri
--
GPG/PGP Key-Id 0x943A5F0E -
http://www.linux.it/~cri/cri.asc
Free software, free society -
http://www.fsfeurope.org