Hello,
I checked my code a bit more. Apparently it was not the case that some un-initialised
garbage was saved but that floating-point errors must have become evident. The original
series of which I calculated the order stats (lq = lower quartile -- lq_lq was the lower
quartile of the series of the lower quartile of the stat "Hunger") was an ARMA
like process, adding and multiplying "close to zeros" (see attached file)...
Just one thing where I did not control for such behaviour. :/
See e.g. Izquierdo, Luis R.; Polhill, J. Gary (2006): Is Your Model Susceptible to
Floating-Point Errors? In: JASS 9 (4), S. 4.
http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/9/4/4.html
Regards
Frederik
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: gretl-users-bounces(a)lists.wfu.edu [mailto:gretl-users-bounces@lists.wfu.edu] Im
Auftrag von Allin Cottrell
Gesendet: Montag, 28. September 2015 22:38
An: Gretl list
Betreff: Re: [Gretl-users] Data Import - non-numeric values
On Mon, 28 Sep 2015, Schaff, Frederik wrote:
thanks very much Allen! I'll take the advice to heart.
Fortunately in
the case where these garbage values are "created" a part of the
analysis (corresponding to these values) has not been conducted and
that is flagged (in another "non-garbage" variable), so I can
post-process these values. What are the "maximal" values gretl takes
as import? +-1e100 and +-1e-100?
Gretl accepts the judgment of the C library on numerical underflow or overflow. On the big
side we can be fairly definite: anything less than 1.79769e308 should be fine. On the
close-to-zero side numbers greater in absolute value than 1e-308 should be OK for most C
libraries.
Allin
_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list
Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users