Hello!
I would like to better understand the rational for using the following formula for
determining the denominator degrees of freedom for the F-test: n(t-1)-(k-1); where n is
the number of regions, t the number of years, k the number of parameters, including the
constant. I thought that the use of the de-meaned data approach compared to LSDV approach
for the fixed effects model would lead to a higher number of denominator degrees of
freedom, as suggested in the Gretl Guide, with the following formula: nt-k.
I would greatly appreciate if someone could shed some light on the matter.
Thank you
Bruno Gobeil
Senior Consultant | Consultant principal
DUNSKY ENERGY CONSULTING | DUNSKY EXPERTISE EN ÉNERGIE
[t] 514.504.9030 *26 [f] 514.289.2665 [e]
bruno.gobeil@dunsky.com<mailto:bruno.gobeil@dunsky.com>
[cid:654DCECB-E50C-4670-80DE-CDA276C82480@home]<http://www.dunsky.com/>
NOTICE: This message (including any attachments) is intended for the sole use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed, and contains information that is
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure. Barring explicit indication to the
contrary in the text of the message, any copying, distribution or dissemination of any
part of this email (including any attachments), by the intended or accidental recipient,
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us
immediately. Thank You.
AVIS : Ce message (et les pièces qui y sont jointes) est destiné à l'usage exclusif de
la personne ou de l'entité à laquelle il est adressé, et renferme des renseignements
privilégiés et confidentiels qui ne doivent pas être divulgués. Sauf si le message invite
explicitement au contraire, il est strictement interdit de copier, distribuer ou diffuser
cette communication (et les pièces qui y sont jointes), en tout ou en partie, cette
interdiction s'appliquant tant au récipiendaire voulu qu'involontaire. Si vous
avez reçu cette communication par erreur, veuillez nous en aviser immédiatement. Merci.