I've got some code block from Riccardo which does a perfect job, Sven.
Indeed, the alternative would be the step-by-step pretesting using the
"omit --auto" function. However, as far as I understood their are some
issues using step-wise pretesting...
Artur
2015-03-25 14:25 GMT+01:00 Sven Schreiber <svetosch(a)gmx.net>:
 Am 25.03.2015 um 11:05 schrieb Artur T.:
> Dear all,
>
> I want to find the optimal lag length of an ARDL model allowing for
> variable-specific lag lengths.
>
> For instance, I've got K variables and want to select the optimal lag
> structure by searching across the (pmax-1)^K ARDL models, spanned by
> p=0,1,..., pmax and p_k=0,1,..., pmax, k=1,.., K using some criteria
> (e.g. AIC).
>
> I am looking for a clever trick to estimate all of these possible models
> but only have a complicated "loop-in-loop-in-loop" structure in mind.
> Does anybody have a clever idea how to realize this task efficiently?
>
 Yes and no -- No if you want a general solution, because then in my mind
 there's basically no way around an exhaustive nested loop. Yes if you
 accept some compromise and possible path-dependence, because then it seems
 you could just use "omit --auto", no?
> Btw, it seems that the latest Eviews 9 version has this feature included:
> 
http://www.eviews.com/EViews9/ev9ecest_n.html#ardl
>
>
 I didn't even know that Eviews 9 has come out.
 cheers,
 sven
 _______________________________________________
 Gretl-users mailing list
 Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
 
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users