I think yes: it's more ''intuitive'' under the
''Analysis'' menu. In order
to avoid some users wondering what happened to thé XXX test, probably we
should rename thé ''Test'' menu in ''Hypothesis test''
which render better
thé idea/tools this menu is supposed to convey/apply
Le 11 nov. 2016 04:28, "Allin Cottrell" <cottrell(a)wfu.edu> a écrit :
I have one thing to announce and one question about gretl's
menus.
Announcement: Following some off-list discussion, there's now a new item
in the right-click menu when you have two or more series selected in the
main gretl window, namely a check on collinearity, in the form of the
condition number of a matrix composed of those series. (You get the choice
of including a constant in the matrix.)
Question: In the model menu there's a Tests menu and also an Analysis
menu. If we think of "Tests" as indicating hypothesis tests (of model
specification and/or regarding the properties of the error term) then there
are two entries which don't really belong there, and arguably would be
better placed under "Analysis", namely "Influential observations"
and
"Collinearity". However, if we were to move them some users may start
asking, "Whatever happened to the XXX test?" So: should we move them?
Allin Cottrell
_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list
Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users