Am 28.02.2018 um 18:41 schrieb Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, Artur T. wrote:
> Am 28.02.2018 um 13:39 schrieb Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti:
>> On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, Sven Schreiber wrote:
>>
>>> Am 28.02.2018 um 11:00 schrieb Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti:
>>>> On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, Artur Tarassow wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> I think we need (even) more advertisement for the great
'Gretl'
>>>>>> project! What do you think about compiling a handy list of
>>>>>> research articles for which we guys used gretl.
>>>
>>>>> Ah, yes, nice idea. Il'll send you mine asap.
>>>>
>>>> On the other hand, thinking about this a bit more, I wonder whether
>>>> this may be counterproductive, sound a bit like an "excusatio non
>>>> petita" and convey the opposite message. Can you imagine a page
>>>> like this on the R website?
> To be honest, I haven't thought about this perspective at all before.
> I spoke to 3 people this afternoon about this. All of them like the
> idea very much. R, Matlab and other well-known competitors don't need
> such advertisement anymore. Gretl, instead, faces some kind of
> asymmetric information issue: Potential users may not be aware of its
> capabilities and they want to see some "seal of quality". Showing
> people some publication record may be such a "seal of quality".
How about some kind of "Hall of Fame", instead?
Thet'd be a list of good-quality papers in which the hansl/gretl combo
was used in some non-trivial way.
This sounds fine to me. Maybe one could pick some examples from both the
micro and macro field.
Best,
Artur