On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Berend Hasselman wrote:
> On 1 Sep 2015, at 23:12, Allin Cottrell <cottrell(a)wfu.edu>
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 1 Sep 2015, Berend Hasselman wrote:
>
>>> On 1 Sep 2015, at 17:16, Allin Cottrell <cottrell(a)wfu.edu> wrote:
>>> We're (over-)due for a new release (which will be gretl 1.10.2) but
before doing that I'd appreciate hearing any feedback about some innovations in our
packages for Windows and OS X: [...]
>>>
>>> * OS X: I've built a version of the quartz package using clang as
cross-compiler, and this has enabled me to add the "wxt" terminal to the gnuplot
that we package with gretl. This means that you can now manipulate 3D plots with the mouse
on OS X. (The Mac-specific "aqua" terminal is still there if you want it, but it
doesn't support this sort of interaction.) This is in the special snapshot at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/gretl/files/snapshots/gretl-quartz-clang....
>>
>> I’ve tested a few things on OS X 10.10.5 (Yosemite)
>
>> Numerics tested with klein.inp. Results are identical to what
>> I’ve had before.
>>
>> Also tested with input (the provenance of which I can’t
>> remember). It uses BFGSmax and results are ok.
>>
>> The 3D plot works as you described (Assuming mouse button 1 is
>> the primary button).
>>
>> There is an issue with resizing a window (e.q. script window).
>> Resizing with the mouse in the bottom righthand side corner the
>> first time doesn’t seem to work. A second try does seem to work.
>> (This also happened in a previous version). GTK-Quartz problem?
>>
>> Berend
>>
>> BTW. I’ve not encountered numerical issues with the R for
>> Mavericks compiled with clang (as compared to the Snow Leopard R
>> compiled with a gcc).
>
> Thanks, Berend. I'll look into the window-resizing thing, and
> also see if I can give the numerical code a bit more of a
> workout, just in case. Glad to hear 3D plots are working as
> intended.
If you have a test script I’ll be happy to run it on OS X Yosemite
to check it.
Thanks, Berend, but I won't trouble you to run the 100+ test scripts
that I just ran on Yosemite. I saw some differences on some
nonlinear problems versus gcc 5.1.1 on Fedora, but I'd say they were
within the margin I expect when I update from one gcc version to the
next (that is, probably just rounding noise).
Allin