Am 09.11.2022 um 13:30 schrieb Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti:
On Tue, 8 Nov 2022, Sven Schreiber wrote:
>
> Maybe this way of handling it is preferable, given that other
> alternatives will also be imperfect. But there is some arbitrariness
> involved in the approach of Eviews.
Granted, there is, but I guess it's better than nothing, provided the
user is notified appropriately.
I'm getting the following output:
<output>
Model 1: OLS, using observations 1-64 (T = 53)
Missing or incomplete observations dropped: 11
Dependent variable: y
HAC standard errors, bandwidth 2 (Bartlett kernel)
coefficient std. error t-ratio p-value
--------------------------------------------------------
const -0.536282 0.122625 -4.373 6.05e-05 ***
x -0.0521759 0.175615 -0.2971 0.7676
...
Sven (or any other): could you cross-check against eviews to see if
results match?
No, not quite. Even if I force the bandwidth to 2 in Eviews (it would
automatically choose 4 here), and switch off the d.f. adjustment, the
standard errors do not match. (Coefficients do match.) I get 0.133099
and 0.140418 instead.
This is still with Eviews 11.
cheers
sven