Am 09.06.2021 um 18:58 schrieb Brian Revell:
I have estimated a fixed effects model for 4 entities 15 observations
on
each.
In one model (Model 2), the dependent variable has been subject to a
prior logistic transform.
In model 4, I used the Panel logistic regression fixed effect model in
which the dependent variable is transformed within the estimation
process. Both re-assuringly produce the same coefficient estimates.
However the diagnostics on the test of common intercepts are different.
In model 4 there is a significant difference at the 7% level, in model 2
it is clearly non-significant.
Why might these conflicting results arise.?
...
Test for differing group intercepts -
Null hypothesis: The groups have a common intercept
Test statistic: F(3, 55) = 1.76308
with p-value = P(F(3, 55) > 1.76308) = 0.164948
...
Robust test for differing group intercepts -
Null hypothesis: The groups have a common intercept
Test statistic: Welch F(3, 28.2) = 2.51034
with p-value = P(F(3, 28.2) > 2.51034) = 0.0789321
The test results are not dramatically different, 8% vs. 16% in p-value.
The apparent difference is that the second one is a robust variant. So
far no mystery here IMO.
cheers
sven