[Gretl-users] Re: missing() on matrix (Re: Re: Functionality of....)
On Mon, 7 Sep 2020, Sven Schreiber wrote:
Am 19.08.2020 um 19:38 schrieb Sven Schreiber:
>
>
> If the missings are not "dispersed" individually but it is always an
> entire row which doesn't have valid numbers I guess you could also do
> something like the following:
> ...
> (BTW, it seems missing() doesn't work on a matrix, in contrast to ok() -
> is that an oversight?)
>
Ping - that question got lost somehow. Is it on purpose?
Well, isnan() does the same job for matrices. But since we've backed
off on the distinction between NaN and NA, missing() for matrices
might as well just redirect to isnan(). That's now done in git.
Allin