Hi Allin,
Thanks again.  You're correct that it's arguable.  What I want to show 
my students is that the ARIMA framework incorporates a number of 
"standard" models:
     Mean = ARIMA(0,0,0) with constant
     Naive = ARIMA(0,1,0)
     Drift = ARIMA(0,1,0) with constant
     Simple Exponential Smoothing = ARIMA(0,1,1)
     Holt's Exponential Smoothing = ARIMA(0,2,2)
     Damped Holt's = ARIMA(0,1,2)
     Additive Holt-Winters: SARIMA(0,1,m+1)(0,1,0)m
Thanks,
Walt
________________________
Walter R. Paczkowski, Ph.D.
Chief Data Scientist
Data Analytics Corp.
44 Hamilton Lane
Plainsboro, NJ 08536
________________________
(V) 609-936-8999
(F) 609-936-3733
walt(a)dataanalyticscorp.com
www.dataanalyticscorp.com
_____________________________________________________
On 10/23/2015 3:09 PM, Allin Cottrell wrote:
 On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Data Analytics Corp. wrote:
> Hi Allin,
>
> Thanks.  I understand the Delta y = error so there's nothing to 
> estimate, yet other programs (JMP) does this.  Anyway, I'll try what 
> you suggested.
 I suppose it's arguable that arima should support the null model as a 
 special case, but as things stand gretl's model-printing apparatus is 
 set up on the assumption that there's at least one parameter estimate 
 to show.
 Here's perhaps a simpler approach:
 series fcerr = y - y(-1)
 summary fcerr
 gnuplot fcerr --time-series --with-lines --output=display
 Or in GUI mode:
 * select the variable of interest
 * choose /Add/First differences...
 * select the difference and right click: look at Summary
   statistics, Time series plot, Correlogram, or whatever
   you fancy.
 Allin Cottrell