Hi Allin,
Thanks again. You're correct that it's arguable. What I want to show
my students is that the ARIMA framework incorporates a number of
"standard" models:
Mean = ARIMA(0,0,0) with constant
Naive = ARIMA(0,1,0)
Drift = ARIMA(0,1,0) with constant
Simple Exponential Smoothing = ARIMA(0,1,1)
Holt's Exponential Smoothing = ARIMA(0,2,2)
Damped Holt's = ARIMA(0,1,2)
Additive Holt-Winters: SARIMA(0,1,m+1)(0,1,0)m
Thanks,
Walt
________________________
Walter R. Paczkowski, Ph.D.
Chief Data Scientist
Data Analytics Corp.
44 Hamilton Lane
Plainsboro, NJ 08536
________________________
(V) 609-936-8999
(F) 609-936-3733
walt(a)dataanalyticscorp.com
www.dataanalyticscorp.com
_____________________________________________________
On 10/23/2015 3:09 PM, Allin Cottrell wrote:
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Data Analytics Corp. wrote:
> Hi Allin,
>
> Thanks. I understand the Delta y = error so there's nothing to
> estimate, yet other programs (JMP) does this. Anyway, I'll try what
> you suggested.
I suppose it's arguable that arima should support the null model as a
special case, but as things stand gretl's model-printing apparatus is
set up on the assumption that there's at least one parameter estimate
to show.
Here's perhaps a simpler approach:
series fcerr = y - y(-1)
summary fcerr
gnuplot fcerr --time-series --with-lines --output=display
Or in GUI mode:
* select the variable of interest
* choose /Add/First differences...
* select the difference and right click: look at Summary
statistics, Time series plot, Correlogram, or whatever
you fancy.
Allin Cottrell