On Mon, 8 Jul 2013, Alecos Papadopoulos wrote:
Good evening everybody. I am rather new to Gretl and my questions
are probably kindergarten-level, but I could not figure out the
answers myself or using Help. So here they are
1) I run maximum likelihood from the script window. I am trying
two different and non-nested stochastic specifications. I have to
compare and evaluate them by using the value of the maximized
log-likelihood. But since they are non-nested, their
log-likelihood functions are totally different. So, suddenly, the
constants of each log-likelihood, although they play no role in
the estimation of the parameters, influence the value of the
maximized logl - and they are different constants.
If I don't include them in the logl function, then the values of
the maximized logl (and the AIC and BIC and HQ criteria) will be
misleading for comparison purposes of the two competing stochastic
specifications, and currently I am doing the corrections by hand
(which I can live with). But it would be nice not to have output
that needs such corrections. I tried to include them in the
specification of the logl after the "mle logl = " command. But
when I tried to include them as, say, "ln(4/sqrt(2/pi))" or
"ln(4/sqrt(2/%pi)) I get "syntax error on the command line".
The recommended way of accessing pi = 3.14... in current gretl
(version 1.9.12) is "$pi", though plain "pi" (deprecated since May
2012) will still work; "%pi" will definitely not work. The
expression
ln(4/sqrt(2/$pi))
is correctly evaluated as 1.612... in current gretl.
When I calculate them explicitly, say 0.45678 and enter this
constant instead, Gretl runs, but the estimation goes astray, and
produces different results than when the constant is not included.
I suspect that this may have something to do with the fact that I
do not specify analytical derivatives, but I really don't know.
What am I doing wrong?
The issue of analytical versus numerical derivatives wouldn't seem
to be relevant to the inclusion or non-inclusion of a constant term
(which obviously doesn't have a derivative) in the log-likelihood.
I suppose something else must be wrong here. I think you'll have to
show us your full script to get useful help.
2) Again for comparison purposes, I would want to have in one graph
the
estimated densities of two series. But when I select two series the
"Variable" menu becomes disabled, while in the "View" menu there are
various graph options, but not the option to graph the estimated
densities of the two series together. Is there a way around this?
This question has come up before. Please see
http://lists.wfu.edu/pipermail/gretl-users/2013-April/008745.html
Allin Cottrell