On Sun, July 16, 2006 05:06, Allin Cottrell wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jul 2006, Riccardo Jack Lucchetti wrote:
> Another thing that IMO needs doing is incorporating
> ad-hockeries into the "settable variables" framework. Case in
> point: boxplots. I plan to do some work on those after
> release, but one thing may (and IMO should) be done before
> that, that is, getting rid of the .boxplotrc file.
Yes indeed, but maybe let's wait till 1.6.1?
Ok.
> [*] Is there anyone out there who still uses gtk 1? If I must
> speak my mind, i'd just say, rest in peace, gui/*. The
> consequent code cleanup would be massive, but well worth the
> effort.
It would be a very satisfying cleanup. Last time I checked
sourceforge (quite a time ago, admittedly) there were still some
donwloads for the gtk 1 rpm. It's probably worth checking
again.
Download statistics can be misleading, though. The gtk1 version is advrtised
as "Generic binary rpm with less dependencies, for older systems" and I
suspect there can be a number of people who don't really know the difference
and download that version just to be on the safe side. Debian and Ubuntu
users, for example, don't have a choice (the packaged version uses gtk2), and
I've never heard a single complaint.
Besides, is GTK 1.2 still under development? Probably not. Is it still
maintained? Suppose a security flaw is found, like a buffer overrun or
something like that. Is there still someone maintaining the older library so
that it can be fixed?
Maybe we could try an experiment: leave the support for gtk1 in the source for
now, but don't provide an rpm file. We can always add that later if people
come up saying "I can't install gretl from the rpm file". Or, if this is
too
radical, we could at least advise users to try the ordinary version first and
install the gtk1 version only as a fallback.
Riccardo "Jack" Lucchetti
Dipartimento di Economia
Facoltà di Economia "G. Fuà"
Ancona