Am 14.03.2014 12:49, schrieb Allin Cottrell:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, Sven Schreiber wrote:
> Am 14.03.2014 09:50, schrieb michel.pouchain(a)univ-paris13.fr:
>> When I use "dyn", the forecast for T+1 is not equal
to the
>> forecats(static) for T+1. Why ?
> Do you mean the point forecasts or the standard errors /
intervals? If
> you really mean the point forecasts, my guess would be that there is
> some small difference in the specification (sample) that you haven't
> noticed, otherwise it would indeed be strange.
>
As regards point values, the two forecasts for 1990:3 (the first
out-of-sample observation) are equal. But the forecasts for 1990:4 are
not equal, because the static one uses observed QNC on the right-hand
side while the dynamic one uses forecast QNC.
Right, but in my reply I stayed with the T+1 case as raised originally.
Thus, if there really are different point forecasts, I would like to see
them and the underlying specifications.
-sven