Allin Cottrell schrieb:
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009, Gordon Hughes wrote:
> Sven may be correct about the potential confusion between data files
> and session files, but I disagree strongly with his solution...
>
> This is a plea to maintain the primacy of gdt datafiles combined with
> script files, which are simple text.
I share your point of view on this. I think we should try to do
something to mitigate the possible confusion that Sven mentions,
but IMO data files and scripts have to remain primary.
Gordon, as my style of working and documenting research seems to be
actually quite similar to yours, I don't really understand why session
files would discourage that. To me a session file in gretl is basically
a collection of objects (data, matrices, graphs, etc.). If you choose to
only use it as a data container, that would be fine. Keeping a script to
replicate research and for documentation purposes is perfectly
compatible with having session files. And for example if you do a lot of
matrix stuff in gretl the only reasonable way to store the calculated
matrices is in session files, because you typically don't want to keep
each matrix in a separate (text) file on your hard disk. The same holds
for your graphs (gnuplot commands).
In principle I don't have anything against the dual approach that gretl
offers (I have only been getting cozy with session files recently myself
and used only data and script files), but it is my impression that it is
difficult to get it 100% right and because of these glitches it has
caused some confusion for users and additional work for Allin.
But, as I'm also a big supporter of backward compatibility, I admit that
making pure datafiles second-class citizens may be too radical for
long-time gretl users that don't follow mailing lists and such ... (sigh)
cheers,
sven