On Sat, 4 May 2013, Gabriela Nodari wrote:
In this way they are the same.. that is a bad news for me! So via
gui the
fevd is not right?
The _presentation_ of the FEVD is different in the GUI, in three
ways:
1) for a VAR with p variables, the results are divided into p
blocks, as opposed to one big matrix.
2) the forecast standard errors for each variable are shown in the
first column of each block (these are not present in $fevd); and
3) the shares attributable to each variable are given as percentages
rather than as decimal fractions.
But a quick check, running the VAR below via the GUI, shows that the
underlying FEVD values are the same as those in the $fevd matrix.
Allin Cottrell
On 04/05/2013 1:18 PM, "Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti"
<r.lucchetti(a)univpm.it>
wrote:
> On Sat, 4 May 2013, Gabriela Nodari wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>>
>> I have notice a great difference between the fevd matrices of the Var
>> estimated via model -> time series -> var and the Svar estimated via
>> console.
>>
>> Someone could help me to understand why is it so?
>>
>
> Weird.
>
> Try this. Do the FEVD matrices look different?
>
> <hansl>
> set echo off
> set messages off
> include SVAR.gfn
>
> open sw_ch14.gdt
> genr infl = 400*ldiff(PUNEW)
> rename LHUR unemp
> list X = unemp infl
>
> var 3 unemp infl
> F0 = $fevd
>
> mod = SVAR_setup("plain", X, const, 3)
> SVAR_estimate(&mod)
> F1 = FEVD(&mod)
>
> print F0 F1
> </hansl>