On Sat, 3 Aug 2013, Giuseppe Vittucci wrote:
 On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 17:30 +0100, Allin Cottrell wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Aug 2013, Giuseppe Vittucci wrote:
>> Moreover, the same option cluster does not work and returns an error if
>> there is at least one missing observation.
>
> I cannot replicate that -- could you give an example?
 It was really hard to replicate the issue....
 Here is a simple example:
 nulldata 10000
 series y = normal(0,1)
 series x = 0
 series d = 0
 loop for i=1..100 --quiet
    smpl index > 100*(i-1) && index <= 100*i --restrict --replace
    d = i
    y = y + i
    x = randgen1(n,0,1)
 endloop
 smpl full
 ols y 0 x
 ols y 0 x --cluster=d
 This works.
 There are 100 clusters each one made up of 100 obs.
 Now, if you remove from y the first observation of each cluster, i.e.
 loop for i=1..100 --quiet
    j = 100*(i-1)+1
    y[j] = NA
 endloop
 or the i-th obs in the i-th cluster:
 loop for i=1..100 --quiet
    j = 100*(i-1)+i
    y[j] = NA
 endloop
 and run:
 ols y 0 x --cluster=d
 gretl returns an error:
 Missing values encountered
 Error executing script: halting
 This instead works:
 smpl ok(y) --restrict
 ols y 0 x --cluster=d 
Thanks again. I now see what the problem was, and it's fixed 
in CVS and snapshots. (The trigger for the bug was that the 
number of missing values, of regressand and/or regressors, was 
greater than or equal to the number of values of the 
clustering variable.)
Allin Cottrell