Folks,
I've had another look at this, and couldn't find any major discrepancies between
my code and Watson's. Attached are 2 script files - one in Gretl, the other a modified
version of Watson's 'uc_ngfilt.gss' (I cut out Watson's data-reading and
calendar routines to keep things focused on the UC filter part). I've also attached a
spreadsheet showing the resulting versions of figures 2a and 2b from each script. Note
that these correspond to the CPIU measure of inflation. They're both based on 5100
total draws with 100 burn-in, and are well within Monte Carlo error of each other. I
can't see any major differences (apart from MC variation) with Stock &
Watson's corrected figures (also attached; see p. 8).
I'm using Gretl 1.9.8 cvs as of 4/6/12, and Ox for the Gauss replication.
Please let me know if you're still finding significant differences, or have any other
questions or comments.
Best,
PS
From: gretl-users-bounces(a)lists.wfu.edu [mailto:gretl-users-bounces@lists.wfu.edu] On
Behalf Of artur tarassow
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 3:31 PM
To: Gretl list
Subject: Re: [Gretl-users] unobserved component model with stochastic volatility (UC-SV)
Hey Allin,
I should have been more precise.
Actually I am trying to replicate figure 2a (std. deviation of the permanent component)
and 2b (std. deviation of the transitory component) from the S/W paper.
If one compares figures 2a and 2b with the results I've obtained with Peter
Summer's gretl code (pdf, attached before) you see that they highly deviate from Stock
and Watson's results. But using the original code I can replicate their figures quite
well (see attached pdf files).
I thought that maybe somebody on the mailing list has already tried to replicate the S/W
paper using their data and Peter Summer's code.
Best,
Artur
2012/5/15 Allin Cottrell <cottrell@wfu.edu<mailto:cottrell@wfu.edu>>
On Mon, 14 May 2012, Artur Tarassow wrote:
Dear gretl mailing list
some while ago, Peter Summers posted his translated code from Stock/Watson's
2007 paper (originally written in Gauss)
(URL:
http://lists.wfu.edu/pipermail/gretl-users/2011-February/005897.html).
I tried to replicate some work, among them Stock/Watson's paper, but
unfortunately I do not get the same or at least similar results using Peter
Summer's code. Even though, the input parameters are as in the original Gauss
code.
What exactly is it that you're comparing between the Stock &
Watson paper and gretl output? And are you using the corrected
S & W output?
http://www.princeton.edu/~mwatson/papers/jmcb_07_stockandwatson_corrected...
Allin Cottrell
_______________________________________________
Gretl-users mailing list
Gretl-users@lists.wfu.edu<mailto:Gretl-users@lists.wfu.edu>
http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users