Re: [Gretl-users] a simple question about arima command output
Am 08.11.18 um 17:53 schrieb Allin Cottrell:
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2018, Allin Cottrell wrote:
>
>> Maybe we should offer atan2 as a built-in function?
>
> Yes, we probably should.
OK, atan2() is now available and documented in git and snapshots.
Hm, welcome in principle, but I wonder if my delayspectral package still
works correctly, or if loading it would now fail because it uses a
function with the name of a built-in.
Cannot test yet myself, because I haven't updated to current git.
If there is a name clash issue there we would in theory have to check
all the function packages whenever core gretl gets a new function. (Are
private functions OK and only public ones affected? Or none at all?)
thanks,
sven